Tesla Model 3 gets a gas engine hybrid conversion – creating the worst Tesla ever

Electric Cars

A company in Austria believes that they can make the Tesla Model 3 “better and cheaper” and they demonstrated their technology in a prototype by adding a two-cylinder petrol engine and removing some batteries in the Model 3 – creating the worst Tesla ever.

Obrist Powertrain, the brainchild of engineer Frank Obrist, developed what they claim to be a “Zero Vibration Generator”, which is a small two-cylinder  petrol engine with an output of 40 KW / 54 HP and a weight of only 95 kg.

The engineer believes that all-electric vehicles are too expensive and that the best way to make them cheaper is by reducing their electric range and adding a small petrol motor, which is basically a plug-in hybrid, but Obrist calls it “hyper hybrid.”

Along with the engine, Obrist’s company also developed a 17.3 kilowatt-hours (kWh) battery pack that weighs 98 kg.

He believes that combining the two small and light power sources inside a Tesla Model 3 would result in a better cheaper car and he claims to have demonstrated it with the  “Obrist Mark II” Tesla Model 3 prototype (piictures by Thorsten Rixmann via Edison):

With the new engine in the frunk and the smaller batttery pack, Obrist clamis that the vehicle can travel 100 km (62 miles) on electric range and up to 1,000 km (621 miles) with the petrol engine.

That all-electric range has its limitations since the engine kicks in to recharge the battery when the vehicle drives at more than 65 km/h (40 mph).

Obrist decided to showcase its technology in the Model 3, a very efficient and aerodynamic car, but they intend to supply their powertrain to other car manufacturers.

In an article published by Edison, they claim to have signed with a “prominent international market player”, and a second license agreement will be completed shortly.

The company expects the first production cars with its powertrain to be on the road by 2023.

Electrek’s Take

I don’t want to be too harsh on the man since, at the end of the day, he still has the same goal as all of us – making the automotive sector cleaner, but that’s not how you do it in my opinion.

He invented a hybrid – just a potentially slightly more efficient one, but you are still burning fossil fuels whenever you go over 65 km/h.

Long term, that’s not going to work.

Yes, all-electric vehicles are more expensive, but the costs are clearly trending down and their impact, when powered by electricity created by renewable energy, is way greater than a hybrid.

Hybrids were a useful transition too all-electric for some people, but by 2023, I don’t think anyone will find it to be a good option for a powertrain.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Subscribe to Electrek on YouTube for exclusive videos and subscribe to the podcast.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Toyota brings back former executive Julie Hamp as media adviser to President Akio Toyoda
2023 Bentley Continental GT Mulliner takes place as two-door’s new flagship model
2023 Porsche 911 GT3 RS spy shots and video: New track star takes to the ‘Ring
China’s chipmaking industry helped by U.S. sanctions
2022 Ford Bronco

Leave a Reply